Zeitview Asset Insights User Guide
1. Understanding Asset Conditions and Anomaly Severity
1. Understanding Asset Conditions and Anomaly Severity
Asset conditions and anomaly severities provide a quick way of assessing the health of your assets and prioritizing issues affecting them.
Solar Asset Conditions and Severities
Solar Asset Conditions and Severities
Solar asset conditions are based on historical, industry-wide performance data that Zeitview has collected over the years. Assets are segmented into quintiles of performance (i.e. 1st-20th percentile, 21st-40th percentile, 41st-60th percentile, 61st-80th percentile and 81st-100th percentile) based on percentage power loss of the site.
The tables below show how asset conditions are assigned to solar farms, inverters, stacks (i.e. Zeitview-defined geospatial regions), and combiners based on the power loss of the anomalies affecting them.
Table of Solar Asset Conditions (Site Capacity ≤ 5 MW DC)
Power Loss (%) - excl. Inverter Outages
Condition
0-0.3
Very Good
0.3-1
Good
1-2
Fair
2-6
Poor
6+
Very Poor
Table of Solar Asset Conditions (Site Capacity > 5 MW DC)
Power Loss (%) - excl. Inverter Outages
Condition
0-0.3
Very Good
0.3-1
Good
1-2
Fair
2-4
Poor
4+
Very Poor
Solar PV Module Anomaly Severities
A PV module’s condition is based on the severity of the anomalies affecting it, and is summarized below.
Table of Solar PV Module Severities
Severity
Types of Issues
Applicable Anomaly Categories
1 – High Priority
2 – Medium Priority
3 – Lowest Priority
Utilities Asset Conditions and Severities
Utility asset conditions and anomaly severities use the same severity scale, where asset conditions are typically assigned a condition that is equivalent to the most severe anomaly identified on the asset. A summary of the conditions and severities are shown below. Note: This summary may not be applicable if your organization has requested a custom severity scheme.
Utilities Asset Conditions
Severity / Condition
Description
Applicable Anomaly Categories
P10
Immediate hazard or active failure requiring dispatch as soon as possible. High potential for electrocution, arc flash, fire, outages, or public safety impact. Urgent Fix ASAP.
P20
Serious issues that are not immediately hazardous but could become dangerous or cause outages if left unaddressed. Should be completed in the next scheduled maintenance window. Fix Within 14 Days
P30
Moderate deterioration or developing issues. Low near-term risk but will worsen if ignored. Included in typical annual maintenance planning. Fix Within 1 Year.
P40
Low-severity, long-term maintenance items. Minimal immediate risk but should be corrected to prevent gradual system degradation. Fix Within 3 Years.
IO
Documentation-only items requiring no corrective action. Used for tracking aging patterns, environmental effects, or non-impactful system anomalies. Information Only
Zeitview Asset Insights User Guide
1. Understanding Asset Conditions and Anomaly Severity
1. Understanding Asset Conditions and Anomaly Severity
Asset conditions and anomaly severities provide a quick way of assessing the health of your assets and prioritizing issues affecting them.
Solar Asset Conditions and Severities
Solar Asset Conditions and Severities
Solar asset conditions are based on historical, industry-wide performance data that Zeitview has collected over the years. Assets are segmented into quintiles of performance (i.e. 1st-20th percentile, 21st-40th percentile, 41st-60th percentile, 61st-80th percentile and 81st-100th percentile) based on percentage power loss of the site.
The tables below show how asset conditions are assigned to solar farms, inverters, stacks (i.e. Zeitview-defined geospatial regions), and combiners based on the power loss of the anomalies affecting them.
Table of Solar Asset Conditions (Site Capacity ≤ 5 MW DC)
Power Loss (%) - excl. Inverter Outages
Condition
0-0.3
Very Good
0.3-1
Good
1-2
Fair
2-6
Poor
6+
Very Poor
Table of Solar Asset Conditions (Site Capacity > 5 MW DC)
Power Loss (%) - excl. Inverter Outages
Condition
0-0.3
Very Good
0.3-1
Good
1-2
Fair
2-4
Poor
4+
Very Poor
Solar PV Module Anomaly Severities
A PV module’s condition is based on the severity of the anomalies affecting it, and is summarized below.
Table of Solar PV Module Severities
Severity
Types of Issues
Applicable Anomaly Categories
1 – High Priority
2 – Medium Priority
3 – Lowest Priority
Utilities Asset Conditions and Severities
Utility asset conditions and anomaly severities use the same severity scale, where asset conditions are typically assigned a condition that is equivalent to the most severe anomaly identified on the asset. A summary of the conditions and severities are shown below. Note: This summary may not be applicable if your organization has requested a custom severity scheme.
Utilities Asset Conditions
Severity / Condition
Description
Applicable Anomaly Categories
P10
Immediate hazard or active failure requiring dispatch as soon as possible. High potential for electrocution, arc flash, fire, outages, or public safety impact. Urgent Fix ASAP.
P20
Serious issues that are not immediately hazardous but could become dangerous or cause outages if left unaddressed. Should be completed in the next scheduled maintenance window. Fix Within 14 Days
P30
Moderate deterioration or developing issues. Low near-term risk but will worsen if ignored. Included in typical annual maintenance planning. Fix Within 1 Year.
P40
Low-severity, long-term maintenance items. Minimal immediate risk but should be corrected to prevent gradual system degradation. Fix Within 3 Years.
IO
Documentation-only items requiring no corrective action. Used for tracking aging patterns, environmental effects, or non-impactful system anomalies. Information Only
Zeitview Asset Insights User Guide
1. Understanding Asset Conditions and Anomaly Severity
1. Understanding Asset Conditions and Anomaly Severity
Asset conditions and anomaly severities provide a quick way of assessing the health of your assets and prioritizing issues affecting them.
Solar Asset Conditions and Severities
Solar Asset Conditions and Severities
Solar asset conditions are based on historical, industry-wide performance data that Zeitview has collected over the years. Assets are segmented into quintiles of performance (i.e. 1st-20th percentile, 21st-40th percentile, 41st-60th percentile, 61st-80th percentile and 81st-100th percentile) based on percentage power loss of the site.
The tables below show how asset conditions are assigned to solar farms, inverters, stacks (i.e. Zeitview-defined geospatial regions), and combiners based on the power loss of the anomalies affecting them.
Table of Solar Asset Conditions (Site Capacity ≤ 5 MW DC)
Power Loss (%) - excl. Inverter Outages
Condition
0-0.3
Very Good
0.3-1
Good
1-2
Fair
2-6
Poor
6+
Very Poor
Table of Solar Asset Conditions (Site Capacity > 5 MW DC)
Power Loss (%) - excl. Inverter Outages
Condition
0-0.3
Very Good
0.3-1
Good
1-2
Fair
2-4
Poor
4+
Very Poor
Solar PV Module Anomaly Severities
A PV module’s condition is based on the severity of the anomalies affecting it, and is summarized below.
Table of Solar PV Module Severities
Severity
Types of Issues
Applicable Anomaly Categories
1 – High Priority
2 – Medium Priority
3 – Lowest Priority
Utilities Asset Conditions and Severities
Utility asset conditions and anomaly severities use the same severity scale, where asset conditions are typically assigned a condition that is equivalent to the most severe anomaly identified on the asset. A summary of the conditions and severities are shown below. Note: This summary may not be applicable if your organization has requested a custom severity scheme.
Utilities Asset Conditions
Severity / Condition
Description
Applicable Anomaly Categories
P10
Immediate hazard or active failure requiring dispatch as soon as possible. High potential for electrocution, arc flash, fire, outages, or public safety impact. Urgent Fix ASAP.
P20
Serious issues that are not immediately hazardous but could become dangerous or cause outages if left unaddressed. Should be completed in the next scheduled maintenance window. Fix Within 14 Days
P30
Moderate deterioration or developing issues. Low near-term risk but will worsen if ignored. Included in typical annual maintenance planning. Fix Within 1 Year.
P40
Low-severity, long-term maintenance items. Minimal immediate risk but should be corrected to prevent gradual system degradation. Fix Within 3 Years.
IO
Documentation-only items requiring no corrective action. Used for tracking aging patterns, environmental effects, or non-impactful system anomalies. Information Only